12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multiseason vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multiseason
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
2
18
3
29
Beste positie
#5
#1
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
Laatste test
2018
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
26
47
99
180

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Multiseason
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multiseason
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multiseason
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multiseason
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multiseason
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multiseason
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Droog
Firestone Multiseason
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
Firestone Multiseason
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Multiseason
58%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Sneeuw
Firestone Multiseason
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Firestone Multiseason
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Sneeuwverwerking
Firestone Multiseason
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Tractie op sneeuw
Firestone Multiseason
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Soelaas
Firestone Multiseason
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multiseason
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multiseason
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Ijs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
23%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multiseason
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store