12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
4
4
18
15
1
28
Beste positie
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
9.0
1.0
2.3
Laatste test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
111
40
47
226
66
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store