12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremie
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremie
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
4
18
1
3
2
3
Beste positie
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Laatste test
2018
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
111
47
64
34
23
40

Nat

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking