12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
10
5
4
18
28
Beste positie
#12
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.0
2.8
3.3
6.1
2.3
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
109
139
40
47
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store