12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
10
1
18
Beste positie
#12
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.0
1.0
6.1
Laatste test
2018
2026
2025
2024
Beschikbare maten
60
109
66
47

Nat

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking