12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Aantal tests
1
10
4
18
13
1
5
Beste positie
#12
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.0
3.3
6.1
4.3
1.0
2.2
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
60
109
40
47
123
66
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store