12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
10
18
5
28
4
Beste positie
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.0
6.1
2.8
2.3
3.3
Laatste test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
109
47
139
67
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store