12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
10
18
28
5
4
Beste positie
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.0
6.1
2.3
2.8
3.3
Laatste test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
109
47
67
139
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store