12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
4
18
13
3
1
28
Beste positie
#12
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.3
3.7
1.0
2.3
Laatste test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
40
47
123
36
66
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store