12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
5
18
4
15
3
28
Beste positie
#12
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
2.2
6.1
3.3
9.0
3.7
2.3
Laatste test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
63
47
40
226
36
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store