12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
18
10
3
4
28
Beste positie
#12
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.1
6.0
3.7
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
47
109
36
40
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store