12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremie
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
18
3
3
3
26
Beste positie
#12
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.1
3.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
47
60
40
34
66

Nat

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking