12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
18
3
6
4
1
28
Beste positie
#12
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
3.3
1.0
2.3
Laatste test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
47
36
146
40
66
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store