12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
1
21
3
18
1
3
26
Beste positie
#12
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
11.9
3.3
6.1
1.0
3.7
2.2
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
164
40
47
64
34
66

Nat

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking