12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
1
6
4
3
18
3
1
Beste positie
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
4.7
3.3
1.3
6.1
3.7
1.0
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
60
146
40
23
47
36
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store