12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
SportContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Aantal tests
1
15
3
3
Beste positie
#12
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
1.2
3.3
4.0
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
60
122
40
54

Nat

Nat
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking