Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Destination HP

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Aantal tests

1

10

6

Beste positie

#3

#2

#3

Gemiddelde positie

3.0

6.0

4.7

Laatste test

2017

2026

Beschikbare maten

35

104

146

Nat

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Droog

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Kosten

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Kilometrage

Firestone Destination HP

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Soelaas

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Destination HP

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking