12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Firestone
Destination HP
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
1
18
3
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
1.0
6.1
3.7
Laatste test
2017
2025
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
35
64
47
34

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking