12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Firestone
Destination HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
3
10
3
Beste positie
#3
#2
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
3.3
6.0
3.7
Laatste test
2017
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
35
40
104
34

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking