12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Aantal tests
1
5
6
15
Beste positie
#3
#1
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
2.2
4.7
9.0
Laatste test
2017
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
35
63
146
225

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kilometrage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking