12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
1
18
2
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
6.1
1.0
Laatste test
2017
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
35
47
23

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometrage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking