Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Destination HP

Roadhawk 2

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

6

28

4

Beste positie

#3

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

3.0

4.7

2.3

3.3

Laatste test

2017

2026

Beschikbare maten

35

146

67

40

Nat

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Kosten

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kilometrage

Firestone Destination HP

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Soelaas

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Destination HP

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Droog

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto's Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk

Firestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS Sport

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Bladeren op merk

GT

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Destination HP

Roadhawk 2

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking