12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Firestone
Destination HP
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
2
3
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
1.0
3.3
Laatste test
2017
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
35
23
40

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometrage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking