Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Premie

Continental

Vergelijk ook met

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Destination HP

EcoContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

5

10

18

Beste positie

#3

#7

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

3.0

13.0

6.0

6.1

Laatste test

2017

2022

2026

2024

Beschikbare maten

35

680

109

47

Nat

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Soelaas

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Destination HP

81%

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Droog

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kosten

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Kilometrage

Firestone Destination HP

60%

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto's Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk

Firestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS Sport

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Destination HP

EcoContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking