12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Test profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Aantal tests
1
5
5
Best position
#3
#7
#1
Average position
3.0
13.0
2.0
Laatste test
2017
2022
2018
Beschikbare maten
35
676

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
75%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
99%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
91%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking