Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Premie

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

Budget

General

Tire Grabber GT Plus

4.3

R15 – R23

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test profile

Destination HP

EcoContact 6

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Aantal tests

1

5

2

Best position

#3

#7

#9

Average position

3.0

13.0

9.0

Laatste test

2017

2022

2023

Beschikbare maten

35

676

64

Nat

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Kosten

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Soelaas

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Droog

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus

Destination HP

EcoContact 6

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Test profile

Nat

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking