12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Firestone
Destination HP
Continental
EcoContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Aantal tests
1
5
3
5
Beste positie
#3
#7
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
13.0
3.7
2.2
Laatste test
2017
2022
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
35
676
34
63

Nat

Nat
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometrage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking