Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Bovenmidden

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

EuroWinter VAN01

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

Aantal tests

1

10

4

3

15

Beste positie

#6

#2

#3

#2

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

12.0

3.3

9.0

Laatste test

2019

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

32

104

111

40

225

Nat

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Natte prestaties

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Droog

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Droge prestaties

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Droogremmen

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Droog rijgedrag

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Soelaas

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Inwendig geluid

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Buitengeluid

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Ijs

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Kosten

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Kilometrage

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

EuroWinter VAN01

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Ijs

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking