Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Bovenmidden

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

EuroWinter HS02

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Aantal tests

4

3

49

Beste positie

#7

#4

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.3

4.3

3.2

Laatste test

2025

2024

Beschikbare maten

98

97

213

Nat

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Remmen op sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sneeuwverwerking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Zijgeleiding op sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Droog

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Droogremmen

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Droge behandeling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Droge stuurrespons

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Soelaas

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Buitengeluid

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Soelaas

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kosten

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kilometrage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

EuroWinter HS02

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking