12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Falken EuroWinter HS02Bovenmidden
FalkenFalken

EuroWinter HS02

6.5
R14 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Falken
EuroWinter HS02
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Aantal tests
4
24
14
3
Beste positie
#7
#1
#1
#4
Gemiddelde positie
12.3
2.7
3.6
4.3
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
98
302
188
97

Nat

Nat
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Falken EuroWinter HS02
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02
48%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Falken EuroWinter HS02
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
43%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Tractie op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Remmen op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
49%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
32%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Zijgeleiding op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%

Droog

Droog
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droogremmen
Falken EuroWinter HS02
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Droge behandeling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droge stuurrespons
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Falken EuroWinter HS02
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Buitengeluid
Falken EuroWinter HS02
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Soelaas
Falken EuroWinter HS02
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kilometrage
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking