12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Falken EuroWinter HS02Bovenmidden
FalkenFalken

EuroWinter HS02

6.5
R14 – R21
Firestone Winterhawk 4Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Winterhawk 4

5.6
R14 – R20
Continental WinterContact TS 870 PPremie
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 870 P

9.3
R16 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Falken
EuroWinter HS02
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
4
19
29
23
Beste positie
#7
#5
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.3
10.7
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
103
102
180
176

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02
66%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Falken EuroWinter HS02
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02
61%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Falken EuroWinter HS02
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Natte zijgeleiding
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Tractie op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Remmen op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Sneeuwverwerking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
57%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Zijgeleiding op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Droog
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Droge stuurrespons
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Soelaas
Falken EuroWinter HS02
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
Falken EuroWinter HS02
85%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Soelaas
Falken EuroWinter HS02
50%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Kosten
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometrage
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 4
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
ADACADAC
Winter
2023205/60 R16Bekijk

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste winterbanden voor sneeuwBeste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste ijsbandenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Uniroyal WinterExpertContinental WinterContact TS 870 P vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850PGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop WINTERGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Bladeren op merk

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store