Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bovenmidden

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

R13 – R21

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

1 gemeenschappelijke test(s) met gedetailleerde gegevens

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

EuroWinter HS01

WinterCraft WP71

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

23

11

49

23

Beste positie

#5

#6

#1

Gemiddelde positie

11.0

12.5

3.2

3.3

Laatste test

2022

2020

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

359

57

213

176

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

72%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

80%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

76%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Remmen op nat wegdek

Falken EuroWinter HS01

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Falken EuroWinter HS01

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Falken EuroWinter HS01

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Falken EuroWinter HS01

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

73%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Falken EuroWinter HS01

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Droge prestaties

68%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

72%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

72%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Droogremmen

Falken EuroWinter HS01

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

66%

Droge behandeling

Falken EuroWinter HS01

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Sneeuwprestaties

89%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

49%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

88%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Remmen op sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter HS01

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Tractie op sneeuw

Falken EuroWinter HS01

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

75%

Sneeuwverwerking

Falken EuroWinter HS01

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

42%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Falken EuroWinter HS01

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

42%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

73%

Comfort & geluid

78%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

56%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Exterieurgeluid

Falken EuroWinter HS01

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Rijcomfort

Falken EuroWinter HS01

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Economie

60%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

51%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

96%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Rolweerstand

Falken EuroWinter HS01

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2020	225/40 R18	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

EuroWinter HS01

WinterCraft WP71

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking