Vergelijking: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bovenmidden

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

ION Evo

Aantal tests

3

14

3

2

1

Beste positie

#2

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

3.7

3.6

3.3

1.5

1.0

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

34

188

40

65

64

Nat

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge stuurrespons

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kosten

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Prijs/waarde

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Kilometrage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Soelaas

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Soelaas

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Buitengeluid

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking