12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Falken Azenis FK520 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Falken Azenis FK520Bovenmidden
FalkenFalken

Azenis FK520

7.3
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Falken
Azenis FK520
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
16
4
1
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
7.5
3.3
1.0
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
141
40
66

Nat

Nat
Falken Azenis FK520
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Falken Azenis FK520
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Falken Azenis FK520
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Falken Azenis FK520
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Falken Azenis FK520
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Falken Azenis FK520
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Droog

Droog
Falken Azenis FK520
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Falken Azenis FK520
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Falken Azenis FK520
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Falken Azenis FK520
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droge stuurrespons
Falken Azenis FK520
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Offroad

Offroad
Falken Azenis FK520
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Falken Azenis FK520
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Falken Azenis FK520
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
Falken Azenis FK520
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Falken Azenis FK520
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Falken Azenis FK520
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Soelaas
Falken Azenis FK520
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto'sBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Falken Azenis FK520 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2Falken Azenis FK520 vs Maxxis Victra Sport 5Falken Azenis FK520 vs Nexen N Fera SportFalken Azenis FK520 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking