12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
2
14
4
17
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
1.5
3.6
3.3
1.7
Laatste test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
66
194
40
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Sneeuw
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Remmen op sneeuw
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Sneeuw in bochten
Dunlop Winter
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Sneeuwverwerking
Dunlop Winter
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Tractie op sneeuw
Dunlop Winter
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Droog
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Dunlop Winter
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kosten
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Prijs/waarde
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Rolweerstand
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometrage
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Buitengeluid
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store