Vergelijking: Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Bovenmidden

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

R13

VS

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

2 gemeenschappelijke test(s) met gedetailleerde gegevens

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

WeatherMaster SA2+

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Aantal tests

8

23

49

Beste positie

#7

#1

Gemiddelde positie

19.5

3.3

3.2

Laatste test

2022

2025

2024

Beschikbare maten

—

176

213

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 2 tests

Natte prestaties

71%

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

78%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Remmen op nat wegdek

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

91%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Droge prestaties

63%

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

84%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Droogremmen

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Droge behandeling

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

56%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Sneeuwprestaties

61%

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

86%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Remmen op sneeuw

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Tractie op sneeuw

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Sneeuwverwerking

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

91%

Prestaties op ijs

80%

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

87%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Remmen op ijs met abs

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Comfort & geluid

66%

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

66%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Exterieurgeluid

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Rijcomfort

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Economie

47%

Cooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

73%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Rolweerstand

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

59%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kilometrage

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

35%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
ADAC	Winter	2022	215/60 R16	Bekijk
Autobild	Winter	2020	245/45 R18	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

WeatherMaster SA2+

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Testprofiel

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking