Vergelijking: Cooper CS7 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bovenmidden

Cooper

CS7

R14 – R16

VS

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

CS7

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

Aantal tests

1

23

14

Beste positie

#15

#1

Gemiddelde positie

15.0

3.3

3.6

Laatste test

2022

2025

Beschikbare maten

71

176

188

Nat

Cooper CS7

54%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Cooper CS7

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Cooper CS7

58%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Cooper CS7

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Cooper CS7

36%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Droog

Cooper CS7

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Droogremmen

Cooper CS7

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Droog rijgedrag

Cooper CS7

48%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Soelaas

Cooper CS7

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Inwendig geluid

Cooper CS7

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Buitengeluid

Cooper CS7

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Cooper CS7 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

CS7

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking