12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Cooper CS7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Cooper
CS7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
1
18
29
14
Beste positie
#15
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
15.0
6.1
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2022
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
71
47
178
188

Nat

Nat
Cooper CS7
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Cooper CS7
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Cooper CS7
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Cooper CS7
36%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Cooper CS7
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Droog

Droog
Cooper CS7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droogremmen
Cooper CS7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Cooper CS7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Cooper CS7
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Inwendig geluid
Cooper CS7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking