Vergelijking: Cooper CS7 vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Bovenmidden

Cooper

CS7

R14 – R16

VS

Premie

Continental

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

CS7

EcoContact 6

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Aantal tests

1

5

14

10

Best position

#15

#7

#8

#2

Average position

15.0

13.0

13.4

6.0

Laatste test

2022

2026

Beschikbare maten

71

675

153

104

Nat

Cooper CS7

54%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Cooper CS7

58%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Cooper CS7

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Cooper CS7

36%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Cooper CS7

69%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Droog

Cooper CS7

72%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Droogremmen

Cooper CS7

80%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Soelaas

Cooper CS7

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Buitengeluid

Cooper CS7

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Inwendig geluid

Cooper CS7

72%

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Cooper CS7 vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

CS7

EcoContact 6

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking