12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Cooper CS7 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Cooper
CS7
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
14
3
2
3
Beste positie
#15
#1
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
15.0
3.6
3.7
1.0
3.3
Laatste test
2022
2025
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
71
188
34
23
40

Nat

Nat
Cooper CS7
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Cooper CS7
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Cooper CS7
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Cooper CS7
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Cooper CS7
36%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Droog

Droog
Cooper CS7
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Cooper CS7
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Cooper CS7
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Cooper CS7
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking