12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
17
6
3
23
Beste positie
#1
#3
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
1.7
4.7
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
80
146
36
176

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Sneeuw
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Remmen op sneeuw
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Tractie op sneeuw
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Sneeuwverwerking
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Sneeuw in bochten
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Sneeuwversnelling
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%
Nat
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Droog
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Soelaas
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Inwendig geluid
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Soelaas
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolweerstand
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometrage
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Prijs/waarde
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Ijs
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store