12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental UltraContactPremie
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact

5.3
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
1
10
4
6
Beste positie
#7
#2
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
6.0
3.3
4.7
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
88
109
40
146
Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto'sBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformanceContinental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Continental UltraContact vs Firestone RoadhawkKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Bladeren op merk

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store