12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
5
4
3
Beste positie
#7
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
2.8
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
139
40
36

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking