12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
1
4
15
5
Beste positie
#7
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
3.3
9.0
2.8
Laatste test
2023
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
88
40
226
139

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking