12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Aantal tests
1
4
5
33
Beste positie
#7
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
3.3
2.8
4.1
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
40
139
658

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking