12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
4
5
3
Beste positie
#7
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
3.3
2.2
3.7
Laatste test
2023
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
40
63
36

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking