12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
4
6
3
Beste positie
#7
#2
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
40
146
36

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking