12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
18
15
3
Beste positie
#7
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
6.1
9.0
3.7
Laatste test
2023
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
47
226
36

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking