12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Aantal tests
1
18
3
33
Beste positie
#7
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
6.1
3.7
4.1
Laatste test
2023
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
47
36
658

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking