12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Aantal tests
1
6
4
15
Beste positie
#7
#3
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
4.7
3.3
9.0
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
88
146
40
226

Nat

Nat
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Droog

Droog
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking